This topic contains 6 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by 
- Posts
In a generic filter, the is an option to specify whether or not a checkbox is initially checked. It there a way to do this also for a post types filter? If not, can this feature be added to a future version?
Hi,
Yes – it depends if the post type is also selected on the General Options -> Sources panel (first option which opens). If it is not selected, the checkbox will be unchecked.
A major filters rework is on the way, it will deal with this issue as well 🙂
Best,
Ernest Marcinko
If you like my products, don't forget to rate them on codecanyon :)
Hi,
Thanks – that’s great, it works fine – cool!
I have another question that’s nothing to do with filters (maybe I should open a new ticket?) : when the filter definition includes term titles and term descriptions, the results of a real-time research do not appear to be counted in the initial total, as can be seen on this page : http://activies-canines.com (search for “CAESC”). But when you click on “More results (2)” box, or scroll to the end of the results, the “missing” results do not show and the total is corrected. Note that the first two results in the list correspond to tags (for articles and FAQs).
Sorry, missing letter in link : http://activites-canines.com
It sometimes happens, as the query can not exclude certain results from the filter criteria, and while the post process code tries to correct it later, it may still “think” there are more results to fetch.
Best,
I can try to debug it to see where mismatch comes from the calculation, but it is more likely I make it even worse – as there are a lot of corrections made to it already.
Ernest Marcinko
If you like my products, don't forget to rate them on codecanyon :)
Hi Ernest,
Don’t worry about it. I reported it more as a service to you than a problem for me.
Take care,
DavidThank you, will still definitely do a few tests on our local test servers just to be sure 🙂
Best,
Ernest Marcinko
If you like my products, don't forget to rate them on codecanyon :)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.