This website uses cookies to personalize your experience. By using this website you agree to our cookie policy.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Does not search custom fields (worked well in Lite) #29921
    AndrewAndrew
    Participant

    Oh that’s very interesting. Hmmm.

    For the pro version, do you still have the type set to “Recipe (wprm_recipe)” instead of Post? Under source it should just be Post, and under Custom Posts include custom post “wprm_ingredients,” …then on the include/exclude tab make it only for category Recipe.

    in reply to: Does not search custom fields (worked well in Lite) #29915
    AndrewAndrew
    Participant

    Yes you’re right that the custom type wprm_recipes is typically associated with posts in the category called Recipes. What I meant was that I want to be able to make similar searches (not using the wprm_recipes type necessarily) in different categories. I want to be able to include (other) custom field types in other post categories. Anyway, sorry I wasn’t very clear before 🙂

    An example of a search term that worked great in Lite is “sesame seed.” This pulled up a recipe that didn’t have that in the title, excerpt, etc, but was in the ingredient list. Since switching to pro, it pulls up no results.

    in reply to: Does not search custom fields (worked well in Lite) #29909
    AndrewAndrew
    Participant

    Thanks for checking it out and getting back to me so fast.

    No, unfortunately that’s not the solution. I want it to be “posts” and then be able to restrict by category, especially because I will be using this same bar for other categories. This was actually why I bought the plugin — the Life version was doing such a great job and I wanted to create more search bars just like it but in different categories.

    Anyway, if you’ve identified that the issue is with a bad import then perhaps the solution is to create a new search from scratch (instead of importing from lite)?

    in reply to: Does not search custom fields (worked well in Lite) #29885
    AndrewAndrew
    Participant

    You cannot access this content.

    in reply to: Does not search custom fields (worked well in Lite) #29883
    AndrewAndrew
    Participant

    Hi Ernest,

    Thank you for the prompt reply! Yes, the custom field is selected (see attached screenshot).

    I’ll include the login details in a separate, private reply.

    Thanks!
    Andrew

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)