This website uses cookies to personalize your experience. By using this website you agree to our cookie policy.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Issues with relevance #22726
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    It’s working! Thanks so much!

    So I should just hold off on upgrading the plugin in the future to avoid this again? Are there any issues with doing that?

    in reply to: Issues with relevance #22708
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    You cannot access this content.

    in reply to: Issues with relevance #22706
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    You cannot access this content.

    in reply to: Issues with relevance #22703
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    You cannot access this content.

    in reply to: Issues with relevance #22678
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    Can you try now?

    in reply to: Issues with relevance #22676
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    You cannot access this content.

    in reply to: Issues with relevance #22673
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    Ok got it. Can you help update the file to the way it was since I already updated the plugin? I can provide FTP access.

    in reply to: Issues with relevance #22665
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    Ernest,

    Exactly, it was with custom field priority. I can revert to an older version of the site, but I would like to ensure this doesn’t happen each time the plugin is updated. Below is our conversation we had a few months ago – of course I didn’t expect you to remember every detail!

    https://wp-dreams.com/forums/topic/issues-with-relevance-etc/

    Thank you for your help!

    in reply to: Issues with relevance, etc. #19024
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    You cannot access this content.

    in reply to: Issues with relevance, etc. #19023
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    You cannot access this content.

    in reply to: Issues with relevance, etc. #19011
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    Also, but I wonder if it would be possible have a 3rd tier as the “Exact” match. Just so when you type in a town, you get the properties in the exact town first no matter what. There might be a situation somewhere in there where a bunch of properties grouped close in a neighboring town will still override the town. I can see it potentially happening with what we have around Union/Elizabeth off the top of my head. Elizabeth is like 1 mile away and the 4 complexes there should show up near the top but it could push the actual Union property to like the 5th on the list for typing in “Union”

    in reply to: Issues with relevance, etc. #19008
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    Hi Ernest,

    I made the update, but it doesn’t seem like the close_match relevance increase is working.

    For example, when you search “elizabeth” the first three results are “Water’s Edge at Rahway, Carlyle, and Elron.”

    Water’s Edge and Carlyle do not have “elizabeth” in the close_match field, but Elron does.

    Any other ideas?

    in reply to: Issues with relevance, etc. #18980
    sfmsfm
    Participant

    Ernest,

    Thanks for your response! I appreciate your detailed explanation as well. That should definitely help with things.

    I have another issue with the order that properties are displayed/ordered. Should it be pulling results according to the order the keywords are listed? Or does it have some different logic? The secondary type results don’t have to be ordered perfectly as it gets further, away but the property that is in the exact town (and the close surrounding) typed in does definitely need to be pulled first.

    Is it possible to pull from two custom fields and factor that into order? We could we have a “close_match” field and then the “search_locations” field where the property results from the “close_match” would show up first and the remainder from “search_locations” after?

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)